Organisation
Answers questions that span teams and structure, and drafts the field changes a reorganisation implies.
Karma · built-in AI
Karma is not a chatbot bolted onto an HR system. It reads across every module — organisation, absence, payroll, recruitment, feedback and learning — because they are one dataset rather than six.
How it works
Karma sits on your live HR data — not a bolted-on chatbot. It reads across every module, drafts the change, and waits for a human to say yes.
Any question about your people, in your own words. No report builder, no filters.
It pulls the data, drafts the change, and shows you exactly what will happen — field by field.
Nothing is written until a person says yes. The approval, and what was changed, goes on the audit log.
Across the platform
The same assistant, working on whatever the module in front of you is about.
Answers questions that span teams and structure, and drafts the field changes a reorganisation implies.
Spots absence patterns early — a team drifting over budget, or a run of short absences that reads like something else.
Explains why a pay line looks wrong, in the words of the agreement rule that produced it.
Reads a job ad and proposes the skills and weights it implies, then explains a candidate's match axis by axis.
Drafts a summary of an evaluation for a person to check — never a rating, and never a decision.
Turns an identified skill gap into a proposed path, assembled from content you already have.
Karma and your data
There are good reasons to be sceptical about AI in HR. Here is what we do about them.
Karma works on your own dataset. The content is not used to train models that benefit other customers.
Karma suggests and ranks. Hiring, pay, warnings and dismissals are decided by people — and that is not a setting you can switch off.
Each suggestion is logged with what Karma proposed, what was changed, and who approved it.
Karma can be disabled per module, if you would like it in recruitment but not in payroll processing.
The quickest way to judge Karma is to put a real question to it against your own org structure.